Progressive Stop Start Roulette Betting
BASICS
- pick 5 numbers
- START betting immediately after any one of those 5 numbers comes up with 1 chip on each
- STOP betting after 5 losing spins
- between START and STOP you might have some wins or none at all i.e., 25 chips lost if no wins (1 chip by 5 numbers by 5 spins)
- still, 25 chips lost at the tail (because after win/s you keep going until 5 consecutive loss spins – then stop)
NOW LET'S HAVE A BLOODY BAD DAY (progressive stakes)
As we saw, the formula is just 5 numbers by 5 spins and keep increasing by 1 chip after losing 3 of these, as in the following example:
STAGE ONE MODEL - 1 chip by 5 numbers by 5 spins
- lost 25 chips (i.e. we stopped betting after 5 losing spins - 1 chip by 5 numbers by 5 spins = lost 25 chips)
- restart betting after any one of our 5 numbers comes up
- lost 25 again in start-stop as above
- lost 25 again as above
- LOST 75 chips so far.
- Jeff, never forget those 3 by 25 chip loss "sets". They make up the 75 CHIP LOSS
- it just stops after 5 losses and restarts after one of our numbers hits (yes, one of our 5 chips is on the last number which won)
- now we're going to have a real bad day. From here on, we simply repeat the above but increase our bet by one chip each time we lose 3 "sets"
STAGE TWO MODEL - 2 chips (same as above, except now 2 chips on each of our 5 numbers)
- lost 50 chips (2 chips by 5 numbers by 5 spins)
- lost 50 chips
- lost 50 chips
- NOW LOST 75 + 150 = 225 chips
- now increase to 3 chips in STAGE THREE, and 4 chips in STAGE 4, etc., etc.
ACTUAL PLAY
write down your cumulative loss (because in real play you usually get a combination of wins and losses, rather than all losses like in the above model)
- at LOST 75 chips, increase bet from 1 chip to 2 chips
- at LOST 225 chips, increase to 3 chips
- at LOST 450 chips, increase to 4 chips
- at LOST 750 chips increase to 5 chips
- at LOST 1125 chips, increase to 6 chips, etc., etc.
- as I said, it a real bad day and it might take another day or so to recoup
Note: don't be tempted to use that formula for something else. It's designed (or at least passed on) by Martin Blakey FOR 5 NUMBERS ONLY
MY EXPERIENCE
- in someone thousand hours of play (about 40,000 spins) using that formula, I've never had to go beyond 6 chips to recoup my cumulative loss but I suspect this is due to my further refinements plus (and most likely) downright good luck.
- somehow, the 2 chip bet, in particular, commencing at 75 chip LOSS, is the most useful clawback tool I've seen
- sometimes I knock off before recouping the loss and then pick up from where I left off the next day or even next week - no problem
- I tried a lot of different logical stuff over many years before I got onto this formula. This is about as good as it gets as far as I can figure out
- my play rarely exceeds 3 chip bet, and more often than not it's just a 1 chip affair before I grab my target win and run, as follows
REFINEMENT - cash management
- my target is always 100 chip win. That done, I hit another table and start all over again
- I ruthlessly quit when I win 100 chips, even if it means snatching my winning chip from the table if that chip makes up the 100
- conversely, I play on with any spare chips over my 100 targets (but mostly lose it while occasionally going on for a big big win but never touching the 100 initial wins)
- I double up on my winning bet, so the outlay is always 5 bets on 5 numbers.
- the double up approach somehow seems to be a cumulative investment toward either recouping or gilding the target win
- I waited for two wins within 5 spins before I commenced betting on the two occasions I had to go to 6 chip stakes
REFINEMENT - two simultaneous games
- I play two entirely separate games of the same roulette system simultaneous
- e. one or other of the 2 sets of 5 numbers is usually operative, and often both at once
- keeping separate scores with separate betting progression etc.
- BUT, 100 chip combined profit = target achieved and I quit all playing roulette immediately (except for only any spare chips
BANK
- experience taught me that the safe bank/bet ratio is 250 :1 (to play my two simultaneous games)
- so, two games = 10 numbers = 2,500 chip equivalent
- g. $5k if playing with $2 chips etc.
- I've found I rarely need anything like that sum, but I could not have made my progressive profits without the 250 :1 ratio
WHICH 5 NUMBERS?
- probably doesn't matter
- for the sake of my sanity, I simply use the first 5 numbers that come up when I sit at the table (at least they are reasonably alive)
- then I adopt the next 5 numbers for my second simultaneous game mentioned above
- I stick with the same numbers come hell or high water until I get my target 100 chips
- but I doubt it would matter if I rotated with different sets of 5 numbers to reach the target
END RESULT
- rarely do I leave without 100 to 300 chips ahead for the day
- occasional bad day outlaying 3 or 4 chips on each number, where it can take up to 10 hours to get the 100 target
- rare occasions involving 25 hours of play over several days or even weeks to recoup and get the target
- starting from where I left off (no, I'm not into it full time - it's just a fascinating little hobby)
- my records show the progressive stakes earn the profit, otherwise, I would be about break-even with flat betting
Table Observation
In watching players, I think I'd rather play my system even on a tiny bank I notice most money gets lost in two ways;
Chasing numbers that don't come up (many players seem to have an overwhelming fear that their number will come up next spin if they stop play. The same fear seems to also pervade the design of many betting systems. For me, it's a bloody marvelous feeling to be able to stop play to ensure that I am at the table when my 5 numbers come in with a gush!
Betting on too many numbers - the more numbers we play the bigger the bank we need. That combination of playing too many numbers (e.g. 2 dozen on the outside) plus continuous non-stop play is disastrous from what I've observed.
Try This Strategy in TOP Live Casinos
Dont forget: This strategy collected from internet. LiveCasinoGuru is not responsible for the accuracy of this information. It is presented for information purposes only. Our task is to collect and present strategies to share experiences. Any possible wins and losses are the responsibility of the player.